Opinion poll

Dear Auction participants,
We kindly ask you to spend a few minutes to complete this brief questionnaire focused on "Secondary capacity market".
We turn to you specially after we experienced the last supporting tool - Noticeboard- to be found as usefull, but not completely solving your need in specified area.

Your responses should contribute to further improvement of services provided by the Auction Office.

Thank you for your cooperation.
Your Auction Office team



Questions
1.

Do you initiate the negotiations of your "secondary" Allocated capacity sales by:

 contacting few business partners
 contacting all the potential counterparties
 waiting for an offer from a counterparty
 any other way? - please specify it in comment space


2.

Do you initiate the negotiations of your "secondary" Allocated capacity purchases by:

 contacting few business partners
 contacting all the potential Allocated capacity keepers
 waiting for an offer from a counterparty
 any other way? - please specify it in comment space


3.

Do you find a new additionally functionality of e-Trace (so called "Noticeboard") allowing you to announce to all APs your intent to purchase/sale Allocated capacity as sufficient solution according to your expectations?



yes


rather yes


dont know


rather no


no



4.

Would you prefer the solution of Noticeboard (from previous question) as more acceptable if designed as anonymous?



yes


rather yes


dont know


rather no


no



5.

There is available an idea of ČEPS, a.s in simple presentation regarding to possible further development of "Secondary capacity market support":

Download presentation in .PPT format here.

 Could you notice your opinion to it?:

6.

Would you welcome besides existing capacity transfer solution an additional solution of Secondary capacity market organized by TSO's? Such Secondary capacity market solution would be based on following principles:

  • continuous trading
  • standard products used similarly as by Power Exchanges (yearly, monthly... capacity)



yes


rather yes


dont know


rather no


no



7.

Please mark your attitude to the additional following variants of this solution (A/B):

  • (A) - Do you prefer the market participant not to be identified during whole procedure?
  • (B) - Would you like the identification to be shown after the deal is done?



A


rather A


dont know


rather B


B



8.

Please mark your attitude to the additional following variants of this solution (A/B):

  • (A) - Do you prefer an automatic matching of orders and registration in capacity rights register of Auction Office?
  • (B) - Would you like the manual matching by the users of the system (the user directly chooses an offer)?



A


rather A


dont know


rather B


B



9.

Would you welcome the transfer of capacity together with obligation to pay for the capacity? (I.e. it will be possible to transfer capacity even though the capacity was not paid yet - prerequisite is that the transferor will overtake obligation to pay for reservation of the capacity and also the transferor's credit limit will be sufficient).



yes


rather yes


dont know


rather no


no



10.

Would you welcome the clearing of payments through Secondary capacity market coordinator ? sharing of financial guarantees provided to cover liabilities resulting from participation in auctions?



yes


rather yes


dont know


rather no


no



Any general comment/opinion to this issue?


Your name and company name, country of origin - not mandatory